Hi! Can you please attach this to a bug! It's easier to track. And CC'ing the announce-lists is NOT a good idea! Thanks, Johannes Am Samstag, den 15.03.2008, 18:44 +0530 schrieb Debarshi Ray: > Here is a patch against the configure.in file in gnome-build-0.2.4: > > diff -urNp gnome-build-0.2.4.orig/configure.in gnome-build-0.2.4/configure.in > --- gnome-build-0.2.4.orig/configure.in 2008-03-10 00:35:35.000000000 +0530 > +++ gnome-build-0.2.4/configure.in 2008-03-15 18:35:54.000000000 +0530 > @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ > -AAC_PREREQ(2.52) > +AC_PREREQ(2.52) > > # Initialization and versioning > AC_INIT(gnome-build, 0.2.4, > http://bugzilla.gnome.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=gnome-build) > @@ -69,6 +69,7 @@ PKG_CHECK_MODULES(GBF, > gtk+-2.0 >= $GTK_REQUIRED > libgnome-2.0 >= $GNOME_REQUIRED > libgnomeui-2.0 >= $GNOME_REQUIRED > + libglade-2.0 >= $LIBGLADE_REQUIRED > libbonoboui-2.0 >= $LIBBONOBOUI_REQUIRED > libxml-2.0 >= $XML_REQUIRED > gnome-vfs-2.0 >= $VFS_REQUIRED > > (i) The first one looks like a typo. > > (ii) Since ./src/gbf/gbf-project-util.c uses '#include > <glade/glade-xml.h>', and ./src/gbf/Makefile.am uses GBF_CFLAGS and > GBF_LIBS, the relevant flags for libglade-2.0 should be included. > > Happy hacking, > Debarshi
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil