Hi! Yes, the anjuta sourceview plugin is using this API a lot for different stuff. Can you point me to the 2.0 API reference so I can review this and possibly some other API? I currently don't have the time to implement all this 2.0 stuff but I think I should be able to see most of the problems from my experience with 1.6. BTW, what time do you meet on IRC? Thanks and regards, Johannes Paolo Maggi schrieb: > Hi GtkSourceView users, > > in these days, we are reviewing the GtkSourceView 2.0 API before > setting it to stone. > > The API review discussion happens on IRC and on > http://live.gnome.org/GtkSourceView/Gsv2APIReview > > I'm writing this mail to ask your help. > > We have no direct experience in the usage of GtkSourceMarker class > because gedit does not use it, so if you are the author of an > application that is using the GtkSourceMarker class, please let we know > your comments on this interface. > > We have found only 3 bug reports on bugzilla about GtkSourceMarker: > > - http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=132525 > - http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=132821 > - http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=132784 > > This could mean that the API is good enough, or that the API is so bad > that no one is really using it. So, please, let we know your comments as > soon as possible so that we will be able to fix the API before the > GtkSourceView 2.0 release. > > Ciao, > Paolo > > > _______________________________________________ > gnome-devtools mailing list > gnome-devtools gnome org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-devtools >
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature