On tis, 2004-07-06 at 10:21 +0600, Victor Porton wrote: > On 05-Jul-2004 James Willcox wrote: Hi, > Hm, the last time I checked GEdit, it was a GTK 1,2 program... I've written > a GTK 2.x program... Now I see that GEdit was switched to GTK 2.x. But is > it really ported well or just hacked? I'm not sure. (I've not yet > downloaded Gedit.) > Anyway (at least so was in the past), GEdit running produced many GTK/GLib > warnings showing that it is not well written, clean program. My gtk2edit > runs without any GLib warnings. GEdit is a very well written program, so in case it is as you states things have changed a lot since you last (a couple of years ago as it sounds) looked at it. > Additionally gtk2edit contains several new technologies for future GTK. It > may be a base for features probably of GTK 2.6, 2.8 or 3.0. It is probably > more important than the editor itself. What kind of technologies are you referring to here? > The conclusion: the right good thing for anybody, both Gnome and Extreme > Code, is for now to have both editors in Gnome in parallel; in the future I > deem Gedit should be replaced with gtk2edit. I don't see any reason to include yet another editor in GNOME that pretty much does the same (less even) than the one we already have. I can totally see it being benificial for your company, but hardly for GNOME. Best Regards, Mikael Hallendal -- Imendio HB, http://www.imendio.com/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Detta =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=E4r?= en digitalt signerad meddelandedel