On Wed, 2003-12-24 at 11:25, iain wrote: > Hmmm, dunno, dunno, oh jpg...whoops, no, it was an executable trojan > renamed to a jpg to trick me into running it. What do you mean, "trick you into running it"? If Nautilus detects it as a JPEG due to the .jpg extension, it's not going to give you the option to execute it as a binary.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part