Re: gtkhtml2 vs. gtkhtml1

On Tue, 2002-09-17 at 18:59, kneumann uni-duesseldorf de wrote:
> guess would be: he either stays with gtkhtml2 or he ports his
> app to gtkhtml1-port. Either way he should be happy. Since you would not
> depend on a library that does not have needed features you do not depend
> on any active development. So first choice is fine. Secondly since
> software developing means carefully designing you program in addition to
> just writing it, a port to gtkhmtl1-port should not be too hard. So
> second choice is fine as well.

now tell me how you will port a gtkhtml2 based webbrowser to gtkhtml1
the result looks like shit. porting itself is not the deal. the problem
is that gtkhtml1 supports nothing. no dom, no css etc...


Name....: Ali Akcaagac
Status..: Student Of Computer & Economic Science
E-Mail..: mailto:ali akcaagac stud fh-wilhelmshaven de

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]