Re: GAL, glade and libglade
- From: John Margaglione <jmargaglione yahoo com>
- To: gnome-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: GAL, glade and libglade
- Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2001 12:24:25 -0800 (PST)
I was actually thinking about doing this a while back. Now that my
machine is stable (hardware problems, not software), I think I'll take
a crack at it. Any suggestions of where to start? I've read through
the new docs on the gtk+ site, but I haven't grabbed a CVS snapshot in
a while.
John Margaglione
jmargaglione yahoo com
--- Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com> wrote:
>
>
> James Henstridge <james daa com au> writes:
> > If all widgets were fully customisable from the GtkArg interfaces,
> then
> > this glue code could probably go as well. I guess this is
> something to
> > aim at for gtk 2.0/gnome 2.0
> >
>
> It would certainly be nice. If someone actually took on the task of
> a)
> converting all existing GtkArg to the GObject equivalent, so they
> have
> docs and change notification and b) ensuring all set/get functions
> are
> also exported as properties, for both GTK and gnome-libs, they would
> be godlike heroes of GNOME. ;-)
>
> Heck I'd settle for someone creating and maintaining a comprehensive
> TODO list of all properties that should exist or be converted to
> GObject so we know what the status is...
>
> Haovoc
>
> _______________________________________________
> gnome-devel-list mailing list
> gnome-devel-list gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-devel-list
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail - only $35
a year! http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]