Re: window-in-window MDI
- From: Mo McKinlay <mmckinlay labs interopen org>
- To: Tom Gilbert <gilbertt btinternet com>
- cc: Chris Jones <chris black-sun co uk>, gnome-devel-list gnome org, recipient list not shown: ;
- Subject: Re: window-in-window MDI
- Date: Sat, 18 Mar 2000 02:58:02 +0000 (GMT)
# There are better implementations everywhere. The tabbed notebook MDI
# that GNOME *already has*. The kind of mdi used by apps such as borland
# builder and the gimp. (One main application window with multiple toplevel
# document windows.
Hold on a second, back up.
When I said better implementation, I wasn't referring to MDI, I was
referring to WiW MDI. Maybe people don't like the tabbed notebook MDI?
Maybe people don't like having windows scattered all around the desktop as
the GIMP does?
# These are great solutions, and can of course be coupled with the
# window grouping available in current window managers.
So what you're saying is...you can get almost the same effects using other
methods, so why bother?
# Best of all, they don't break everything, like this one does.
I fail to see how WiW MDI "breaks everything".
# You didn't tackle *any* of the points I made. You can't blame "code
# which will be improved". The points I made are intractable with this
# design.
Your points pretty much centered around you not liking how it looks. What
you FAIL to see is that others DO like how it looks, and how it works.
# Just because a few users think they want something doesn't mean it has
# to be provided. Especially when it is Wrong.
Forget that last sentence and you might have a point. "Especially when it
is Wrong" is no kind of reasoning.
--
Mo McKinlay T: +44 (0) 709 22 55 05 x1
Chief Software Architect F: +44 (0) 709 22 55 05 x3
inter/open E: mmckinlay@labs.interopen.org
A division of Bekon Marketing Limited W: http://www.interopen.org
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]