Re: Patch for gnome-libs
- From: Raja R Harinath <harinath cs umn edu>
- To: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs eazel com>
- Cc: Dan Winship <danw helixcode com>, Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>, Miguel de Icaza <miguel helixcode com>, gnome-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Patch for gnome-libs
- Date: 14 Mar 2000 17:51:19 -0600
Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@eazel.com> writes:
> Dan Winship <danw@helixcode.com> writes:
> > > A fixit item for 2.0.
> >
> > If we're moving things around, it would be nice to put gnome-config
> > scripts into $(libexecdir) ["The directory for installing executables
> > that other programs run."] rather than $(libdir) ["The directory for
> > installing object code libraries."]. (Because they're not the same
> > everywhere.)
>
> It's too bad that FHS doesn't have /libexec or /usr/libexec. It makes
> it awkward to configure GNUishly correct packages to be FHS compliant.
I think the recommended way would be to use something like
./configure --prefix=/usr --libexecdir=/usr/lib --sysconfdir=/etc
- Hari
--
Raja R Harinath ------------------------------ harinath@cs.umn.edu
"When all else fails, read the instructions." -- Cahn's Axiom
"Our policy is, when in doubt, do the right thing." -- Roy L Ash
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]