xxxConf.sh files (Re: Patch for gnome-libs)
- From: Raja R Harinath <harinath cs umn edu>
- To: Dan Winship <danw helixcode com>
- Cc: Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>, Miguel de Icaza <miguel helixcode com>, gnome-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: xxxConf.sh files (Re: Patch for gnome-libs)
- Date: 14 Mar 2000 17:48:17 -0600
Dan Winship <danw@helixcode.com> writes:
> > A fixit item for 2.0.
>
> If we're moving things around, it would be nice to put gnome-config
> scripts into $(libexecdir) ["The directory for installing executables
> that other programs run."] rather than $(libdir) ["The directory for
> installing object code libraries."]. (Because they're not the same
> everywhere.)
Yep. Actually, I think the current HEAD gnome-libs installs them into
$(datadir)/gnome/conf/2, which is even worse than $(libdir).
> gnomesupport.h and glibconfig.h don't belong in subdirs of $(libdir)
> either, but unfortunately the GNU standards say you shouldn't have
> architecture-dependent config files, so autoconf doesn't provide any
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> better place to put them.
I know. We did quite a bit of soul-searching ;-) when we put those
files into $(libdir). IIRC Owen Taylor suggested, and Tom Tromey
seconded, that $(pkglibdir)/include was as sane a place as any.
BTW, ITYM "architecture-dependent header files". I don't know if they
are explicitly forbidden, or just not supported.
- Hari
--
Raja R Harinath ------------------------------ harinath@cs.umn.edu
"When all else fails, read the instructions." -- Cahn's Axiom
"Our policy is, when in doubt, do the right thing." -- Roy L Ash
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]