Re: Some general facts about panel and gnome

["FALLON,DAVID JOSEPH" <dfallon ucla edu>]

> >  Fact 4: Either tell enlightenment (best window manager in my opinion) 
> > folks to be compliant or fork if you wanna keep it as default gnome 
> > window manager! Someone with good window manager knowledge should do 
> > it! I have yet to see another decent window manager for gnome that is 
> > at least not completely ugly! We NEED a default 100% compatible window 
> > manager by default. Other are welcome to comply if they wish!
> 
> Most users these days think that sawmill is the best GNOME window
> manager out there; Many people think Sawmill has a very good code
> base, uses little memory, it is very efficient and has exceptional
> extensibility trough its build-in scripting language (all of Sawmill's
> features are implemented as scripts, even GNOME compliancy is done by
> a script)

That, and (one of) sawmill's goals is to be a really good GNOME window
manager. This is a sharp contrast from enlightenment, where the authors
have publicly mouthed off about how they don't like where gnome is going,
and plan to have their own "mini" desktop.

> 
>