Re: wxWindows and GNOME
- From: Robert Roebling <roebling uni-freiburg de>
- To: gnome-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: wxWindows and GNOME
- Date: Sat, 28 Aug 1999 12:22:33 +0200 (MET DST)
On Fri, 27 Aug 1999, Karl Nelson wrote:
> The other approach is to use the tools that are there and
> subsititute for them if they are missing.
You misunderstood me: I removed libtool and autoconf, because
they don´t work (libtool cannot create C++ libraries unless
you rewrite parts of it, automake cannot do "make dist" if
the source is in different directories (compiled using VPATH).
> I wrote libsigc++ to work accross almost as many platforms
> as WxWindows,
I´m not sure what libsigc++ is, but I guess it is a library
for adding to C++ the obvious missing thing, a standard way
to propagate events. Well "almost as many" may not be what
we want any I can imagine that wxWindows might be be a little
bigger so that an approach that works for your library might
not be the right thing for the likes of wxWindows.
> WxGtk no more deserves to be in GNOME release than Gtk-- or VDK .
Never did I say so or remotely thought that.
> so if we include it we might as well include Qt and it is as
> closely related.
Read this sentence again and ask yourself: "Was this really my
honest belief?" Isn´t maybe the GTK toolkit a distinguishing
feature of the GNOME environment?
> Gtk-- will become cross platform as well. As a language binding
> it will be everywhere that Gtk+/GNOME run.
"Everywhere that Gtk+/GNOME might run" maybe. This is still a tiny
bit different from "just about everywhere", actually the difference
between the (maybe) 100.000 GNOME machines in the 100.000.000 others.
> If you are looking for a language binding for Gtk+
> in C++ use Gtk--, if you are looking for the cross platform
> Wx API use WxGtk.
Perfectly true: sofar GNOME offers only one of these, it could
offer both.
> wxWindows´s goals do not seem to match those of GNOME
A 100% pure GNOME world? GNOME-- will be good for that,
wxWindows for the remaining 95% of reality.
> Therefore, which is a better chose to include in GNOME?
Both.
> I personally think unless a large number of GNOME applications
> (not gnome-like) start using one of the bindings, should
> that binding be included.
Er - I didn´t understand this one.
Robert
Robert Roebling <roebling@ruf.uni-freiburg.de>
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]