Re: [gnome-db] SqlBuilder feedback



2009/12/2 Murray Cumming <murrayc murrayc com>:
> On Wed, 2009-11-25 at 22:36 +0100, Vivien Malerba wrote:
>> >> I would append _id to the existing functions, so, for instance:
>> >>   gda_sql_builder_add_field()
>> >> would become
>> >>   gda_sql_builder_add_field_id()
>> >> and then add real gda_sql_builder_add_field() and
>> >> gda_sql_builder_add_field_value() functions like above, but without
>> >> "easy" in their name.
>> >
>> > Thoughts? I don't want to give up on this API. It could be very useful
>> > in glom an in general.
>> >
>>
>> You can now check commit
>> http://git.gnome.org/cgit/libgda/commit/?id=9ecb4bc9f8d4cfc2dad31a5109b610f6988c2fd9
>> which has the new API.
>
> Thanks. That's much better.
>
> How about doing the same for the other functions, such as
> gda_sql_builder_select_add_target(), gda_sql_builder_add_cond(), etc?
>
> I can do that if you like.

That'd be great, yes.

Thanks,

Vivien


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]