Re: [gnome-db] Libgda modifications in CVS HEAD
- From: Rodrigo Moya <rodrigo gnome-db org>
- To: Murray Cumming <murrayc murrayc com>
- Cc: Daniel Espinosa <esodan yahoo com mx>, gnome-db-list <gnome-db-list gnome org>, Vivien Malerba <vmalerba gmail com>
- Subject: Re: [gnome-db] Libgda modifications in CVS HEAD
- Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2005 17:45:22 +0100
On Tue, 2005-01-11 at 15:17 +0100, Murray Cumming wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-01-11 at 00:00 +0100, Rodrigo Moya wrote:
> > On Mon, 2005-01-10 at 16:59 -0600, Daniel Espinosa wrote:
> > > This change is API incompatible with the last version
> > > of LibGDA, then is it correct for a version 1.x?
> > >
> > no, API changes are not allowed in the 1.2 series. We might probably
> > high the version number to 2.0 for that version
>
> So this new libgda version will be parllel-installable with libgda-1.2.
>
> So it needs a new pc file, and a different name for the libarary. Do you
> plan to make those changes?
>
> Unfortunately, you already use "2" in the library name,
> /opt/gnome210/lib/libgda-2.so
> so you might want to choose a different even number for this new version
> to avoid confusion.
>
hmm, right. What about calling the lib libgda-2-0.so or something, and
thus make it match with the libgda version number?
Or any other idea? Having libgda-2.0.pc and libgda-3.so might be a bit
confusing.
--
Rodrigo Moya <rodrigo gnome-db org>
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]