Re: [gnome-db] libgda freeze for GNOME 2.12?

[Rodrigo Moya <rodrigo gnome-db org>]

On Sun, 2005-08-21 at 14:33 +0200, Murray Cumming wrote:
> Are you really planning to freeze the libgda HEAD for GNOME 2.12?

yes, we're already frozen

>  I have
> fairly strong doubts that this is possible? I don't think that this new
> API has really had enough testing, though that's partly my fault for not
> wrapping it for C++ yet (partly because it was changing so much).
> 
well, right, more testing would have been much better. In any case, if
you are quick enough, we can do some exceptions to the freeze and commit
a few changes, so please go ahead :)

> And I think it should have been officially frozen at the GNOME 2.12 API
> freeze time to reach real API freeze at the same time as GNOME 2.12.
> 
when was/is the 2.12 API freeze?

> I know of at least one bug that should be fixed before a .0 version
> because you couldn't really fix it afterwards:
> http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=311967
> 
> Ideally this would be done too:
> http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=310226
> 
> This would be nice too:
> http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103230
> 
ok, will look at those bugs

> I will try to wrap it soon for libgdamm, now that it's settled down a
> bit.
> 
yes, please :)
-- 
Rodrigo Moya <rodrigo gnome-db org>