Re: [gnome-db] A patch for nothing in particular
- From: Rodrigo Moya <rodrigo gnome-db org>
- To: Paisa Seeluangsawat <paisa unt edu>
- Cc: GDA <gnome-db-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: [gnome-db] A patch for nothing in particular
- Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2003 01:00:47 +0100
On Thu, 2003-11-13 at 07:58, Paisa Seeluangsawat wrote:
> I'm trying to work on parts that are not dependent on update syntax
> for now. Here's an errand patch. This weekend, I'll work on,
>
> - remove const from GdaRow* and GdaValue*, and other glib/libgda structs
> I see along the way.
>
> - implement is_null
>
> If anyone objects to these two ideas, please speak NOW. You hear
> it...now, not after the patch come...please.
>
both things look perfect to me. Some comments inline:
> Index: libgda/gda-connection.c
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvs/gnome/libgda/libgda/gda-connection.c,v
> retrieving revision 1.51
> diff -u -r1.51 gda-connection.c
> --- libgda/gda-connection.c 18 Oct 2003 23:03:52 -0000 1.51
> +++ libgda/gda-connection.c 13 Nov 2003 06:20:36 -0000
> @@ -207,7 +207,7 @@
> GdaDataSourceInfo *dsn_info;
> GdaQuarkList *params;
> const char *real_username = NULL;
> - const char *real_password = NULL;
> + char *real_password = NULL;
>
I guess real_username should also not be const, since it's g_strdup'ed
below:
> if (dsn_info->username)
> real_username = g_strdup (dsn_info->username);
> Index: libgda/gda-row.c
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvs/gnome/libgda/libgda/gda-row.c,v
> retrieving revision 1.36
> diff -u -r1.36 gda-row.c
> --- libgda/gda-row.c 11 Nov 2003 16:48:36 -0000 1.36
> +++ libgda/gda-row.c 13 Nov 2003 06:20:36 -0000
> @@ -48,7 +48,7 @@
> * @model: the #GdaDataModel this row belongs to.
> * @count: number of #GdaValue in the new #GdaRow.
> *
> - * Creates a #GdaRow which can hold @count #GdaValue.
> + * Creates a #GdaRow from a list of #GdaValue's.
> *
this comment is wrong, isn't it? The original one seems the correct one.
apart from that, looks ok, so please fix that and commit, only to HEAD.
Thanks
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]