Re: [gnome-db] Minor API change and MySQL [update/delete]_row
- From: Paisa Seeluangsawat <paisa unt edu>
- To: Rodrigo Moya <rodrigo gnome-db org>
- Cc: Paisa Seeluangsawat <paisa unt edu>, GDA <gnome-db-list gnome org>, Laurent Sansonetti <laurent datarescue be>
- Subject: Re: [gnome-db] Minor API change and MySQL [update/delete]_row
- Date: Sat, 01 Nov 2003 18:19:30 -0600
> > end users". This include all of the following examples you've been
> > using,
> >
> > any data model implementation. ... They can be created, if wanted,
> > byan application using libgda.
> >
> > yes, but data models can be implemented by anything, not only by
> > providers.
> >
> > a program could want to create its own data-model-based class, for
> > instance.
> >
> > if they are implementing a data model.
> >
> > Any app can create its data model-based class, and in that case it
> > will need those functions.
> >
> > What I'm asking is separate headers for PRVD functions. These headers
> > will be public, i.e. can be #included by the end users.
> >
> yes, I understood from the beginning :-)
You have been using this "user code managing data" as a counter
example again and again (at least 5 times). So I didn't realize that
you understood this from the beginning.
You've provided several new arguments in your latest e-mail. I don't
have a good case against some of those arguments so I will agree that
these functions will stay in just one header file.
[Date Prev][
Date Next] [Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]