Re: [gnome-db] post-GUADEC plans
- From: Rodrigo Moya <rodrigo gnome-db org>
- To: Xabier Rodríguez Calvar <xrcalvar igalia com>
- Cc: GDA <gnome-db-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: [gnome-db] post-GUADEC plans
- Date: 22 Jun 2003 14:45:00 +0200
On Fri, 2003-06-20 at 18:32, Xabier Rodríguez Calvar wrote:
> >
> > * libgda/libgnomedb should reach a 1.0 version at that time. And,
> > looking at the current status, it seems we can punt some functionality
> > originally planned for 1.0 and concentrate on stabilizing the current
> > codebase, writing documentation, fixing crashes, etc.
> > Thinking about this, it seems to me a good idea, since I have to agree
> > that the objectives for 1.0 have been large too much (reports, graphics,
> > lots of providers, etc). So, freezing now (or in a few weeks time so
> > that some new features can be added for a little while) could help us in
> > making more widely known our work. Also, it seems to me
> > libgda/libgnomedb (5 years old) really need a 1.0 ASAP.
> > The punted features would be marked as post-1.0 work, and we can even
> > CVS branch and have people work on post-1.0 while we prepare 1.0. So,
> > this means development would not be stopped. I will myself (and I hope
> > other people too :-) concentrate on 1.0, but won't stop anyone to work
> > on other things.
>
> What about prepared statements? I think it could be a good idea to include
> them in the 1.0 version. This summer I return to Igalia and I think I'm going
> to work on Fisterra (http://www.fisterra.org), I'm not sure about the
> feature, but I'll try to talk to them to make, for instance, the support for
> postgresql driver. What's your opinion?
>
If you do it soon, it will be in 1.0 :-) That is, I guess we are going
to freeze in the last weeks of July, so any feature added before that
will be in 1.0, unless it's buggy and/or unfinished, in which case it
will be disabled in the final 1.0.
cheers
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]