Re: [gnome-db] libgda-0.91.0 specfile error?

[David T Hollis <dhollis davehollis com>]

Adam Williams wrote:

> > > Sry, "libgda-0.91.0" SRPM from gnome-db ftp specfile.
> > > Meant the specfile on the SRPM, actually this issue is not present on
> > > cvs's specfile.in 
> > >      
> > well, then, no need to patch CVS. Maybe we should rebuild the SRPM with
> > the spec file in CVS. Adam, how does that sound?
> >    
>
> Fine with me.  So yank just that file from CVS and build with the 0.91
> tarball?
>
> I think I missed the first message in this thread, not exactly clear
> what the error is.
>
> _______________________________________________
> gnome-db-list mailing list
> gnome-db-list gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-db-list
>  
I don't understand the point of the patch either.  It would just revert 
the spec file back to it's 'default' settings.  It looks like the SRPM 
he was using had been edited to include support for MDB and SQLITE.  At 
this moment, the libgda.spec.in in the 0.91.0 tarball (and presumably 
CVS as well) enables Postgres, MySQL and ODBC by default.  All others 
are off.