Re: [gnome-db] Gnome DB 0.9 / FreeTDS 0.60 fixes

[Brian Bruns <camber ais org>]

Easiest thing to do is to check for tds.h in the include path somewhere, 
tdsver.h is not guaranteed to be available in subsequent releases.

I'll forward the spec patch to the current maintainer.
 
On 30 Dec 2002, Rodrigo Moya wrote:

> On Mon, 2002-12-30 at 07:17, David T Hollis wrote:
> > Here are some patches I created to get the 0.9 SRPMS (RH8) to compile 
> > correctly on my system.  I tweaked the FreeTDS spec file to put the .a 
> > files (static-link libs) in the -devel package for cleanliness and had 
> > to create a patch for the configure script for libgda to find the 
> > FreeTDS headers in the right place (/usr/include/freetds).
> > 
> > 
> > ______________________________________________________________________
> > 
> > --- freetds.spec	2002-12-12 09:51:17.000000000 -0500
> > +++ freetds.spec.new	2002-12-30 00:57:39.000000000 -0500
> > @@ -3,16 +3,19 @@
> >   
> this patch, I guess, should be sent to the FreeTDS developers, some of
> which might be listening in this list
> ________________________________________________________________________
> > 
> > --- configure.in.orig	2002-12-30 00:55:56.000000000 -0500
> > +++ configure.in	2002-12-30 00:56:56.000000000 -0500
> > @@ -284,7 +284,7 @@
> >  	AC_MSG_CHECKING(for freetds files)
> >  	for d in $dir /usr/local/freetds /usr /opt/freetds /opt/packages/freetds /opt/freetds-0.50
> >  	do
> > -		if test -f "$d/include/tds.h" -a -e "$d/lib/libtds.so" -a -f "$d/include/tdsver.h"
> > +		if test -f "$d/include/freetds/tds.h" -a -e "$d/lib/libtds.so" -a -f "$d/include/freetds/tdsver.h"
> >  		then
> that won't work on my debian system, which has FreeTDS headers in
> /usr/include, not /usr/include/freetds. So, could you please modify the
> patch to work on both cases?
> 
> 
> > --- libgda.spec	2002-12-30 00:49:37.000000000 -0500
> > +++ libgda.spec.new	2002-12-30 01:12:17.000000000 -0500
> > @@ -13,7 +13,7 @@
> seems correct to me, but you should be patching libgda.spec.in instead,
> since libgda.spec is generated from it. Please resend the patch for the
> correct file and I'll apply it.
> 
> cheers
>