Re: request change at GDA_Report.idl
- From: Rodrigo Moya <rodrigo gnome-db org>
- To: Carlos Perelló Marín <carlos hispalinux es>
- Cc: gnome-db-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: request change at GDA_Report.idl
- Date: 07 Jan 2001 14:13:26 +0100
> typedef sequence<octet> Chunk;
> interface ReportStream {
> Chunk readChunk (in long start, in long size);
> long writeChunk (in Chunk data, in long size);
> long getLength ();
> };
> </new>
>
> If we don't change this we have at the implementation code a variable
> like: GDA_ReportStream_ReportStreamChunk and IMO, this kind of variables
> aren't good.
>
yes, you're maybe right. But, in fact, what should be changed are all the IDL
interface names, since they're all like Report..., and the
CORBA-generated functions are GDA_Report_Report..., when they should be
GDA_Report_..... So, yes, if you want to change it, do it, but please do
it for all interfaces.
cheers
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]