["Carlos Perello Marin" <carlos hispalinux es>] Re: gda-report and gnue
- From: Carlos Perello Marin <carlos hispalinux es>
- To: gnome-db-list gnome org
- Subject: ["Carlos Perello Marin" <carlos hispalinux es>] Re: gda-report and gnue
- Date: 13 Sep 2000 15:54:39 -0100
--- Begin Message ---
- From: Carlos Perello Marin <carlos hispalinux es>
- To: James Thompson <jamest math ksu edu>
- Cc: Carlos Perello Marin <carlos hispalinux es>, Rodrigo Moya <rodrigo linuxave net>, derek gnue org, gnome-db gnome org
- Subject: Re: gda-report and gnue
- Date: 13 Sep 2000 15:39:08 -0100
>
> > > if we all agree in putting it in GDA, this should be libgda-report, but
> > > please
>
> Please forgive me for jumping into the middle of this. I'm behind on
> mail and have yet to get cvs libgda to build for testing in gnue forms
> (I know it was covered on the list but the archive links are broken)
>
> I think the report system should be seperate from gda as I see libgda in
> the same light as ODBC, Perl's DBI, etc. It's an API to access
> data. Following this naming/packaging scheme we'd name products like
> odbc-reports, perl-dbi-reports, etc.
But for this old the *-reports need the gda-xml-query API, remember
it!!!
>
> Putting a report system into libgda adds bloat and confuses the
> purpose IMHO. I see a much better seperation as
>
> data source
> |
> libgda
> |
> ______________________________________________________
> | | | |
> GNUe Reports gnome-db GNUe Forms Other Apps
> (I'm bias :) (the gtk stuff) using libgda
>
>
> Maybe I'm overlooking something?
>
> Take Care
> James
>
> ->->->->->->->->->->->->->->->->->->---<-<-<-<-<-<-<-<-<-<-<-<-<-<-<-<-<-<
> James Thompson 138 Cardwell Hall Manhattan, Ks 66506 785-532-0561
> Kansas State University Department of Mathematics
> ->->->->->->->->->->->->->->->->->->---<-<-<-<-<-<-<-<-<-<-<-<-<-<-<-<-<-<
>
--- End Message ---
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]