Re: Antw: A question about the gda-xml-query

> > > I don't have anything ready yet because I'm working on making the
> postgres
> > > provider work with versions 6.5.x and 7.0.x (which is quite a lot of
> work
> > > and test). But anyway, before I start to write a line of code for the
> > > gda-xml-query lib, I will issue my thoughts on how to organize it and on
> > > how to use it.
> >
> > Should 6.5.X still be supported? 7.0.X was released in April and 7.1 will
> come
> > soon, as Bruce Momjian told me.
> >
> I suppose this is the best thing to do, to support all versions, if possible
> of course.

I agree with you.

> > I think the usage of DB-links is transparent for DML-queries and concerns
> only
> > DDL-queries, because we need a CREATE/DROP DATABASE LINK statement.
> > As we discussed some time ago, the DDL-queries should be defined in a
> database DTD,
> > that Rodrigo wanted to develop, right?
> >
> Yes, that what I also thought. As Gerhard says, the use of a DB-link is
> transparent for the queries. You just specify the name of the table, which
> can be whether a normal table, a view, a DB-link, etc. don't you think so?

All right, that seems to be the right solution. BTW what do DML and DDL stand 
for (I don't remember that discussion, maybe I have missed it when I was on


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]