Re: libgda++

[Derek Neighbors <d_neighbors llamacom com>]

At some point now that dependencies are dwindling that libGDA could be
made to work on winodws(i know sounds goofy, but some people are sick and
twisted).  I am not sure if ++ is valid file name on win32, but you might
want to verify that it is to avoid possible porting problems in teh
future.

Derek Neighbors
GNU Enterprise
http://www.gnue.org
derek gnue org

> > >I would really prefer ++, but if it's really true that it will cause problems
> > >(is that true?)....
> >
> >          I don't really know about such problem. '+' is a valid character for
> >          a file name ... so, I don't know which kind of problem this will
> > bring.
> >          But we can keept libgdamm-client, libgdamm-common and libgdamm-server.
> >
> 
> ok, so + is a valid character, so what was said about this? I don't remember...
> well, anyway, please call them as you want, but follow the same conventions:
> 
> libgda-clientmm (not libgdamm-client)
> libgda-commonmm (not libgdamm-common)
> libgda-servermm (not libgdamm-server)
> 
> cheers
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> gnome-db-list mailing list
> gnome-db-list gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-db-list
>