Re: libgda++

[rodrigo linuxave net]

Derek Neighbors wrote:

> At some point now that dependencies are dwindling that libGDA could be
> made to work on winodws(i know sounds goofy, but some people are sick and
> twisted).  I am not sure if ++ is valid file name on win32, but you might
> want to verify that it is to avoid possible porting problems in teh
> future.
>

yes, that's a good point. Let's go for 'mm' or 'cpp'. Laurent you choose which one,
but please, sorry for saying it again, but follow the same naming conventions as the
rest of the libs:

libgda-clientmm, etc