RE: diffenrences between providers / servers
- From: "PINEAU, Cedric" <cedric pineau dree org>
- To: gnome-db-list gnome org
- Subject: RE: diffenrences between providers / servers
- Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2000 17:42:16 +0300
Well, I think this is exactly what the XML Query is for.
DTD for querys and reports are the hot subject at that time on this list.
How did you get through ? ;-)
Cedric
> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org
> [mailto:gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org]De la part de Jens P. Elsner
> Envoye : mercredi 26 juillet 2000 17:24
> A : gnome-db-list@gnome.org
> Objet : diffenrences between providers / servers
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I haven't done any programming with gdb yet, but I did some with
> ADO / DAO and the other M$ stuff.
>
> The the main problem I encountered when developing db independend
> apps is
> that the SQL dialect you have to use when querying different data
> sources differs. The query is, for the most part, just
> passed on to the driver, isnt it? Just one example from ADO:
> parameters work fine with one datasource, but the same query
> doesnt (parameters in a union select) work with another one.
>
> Isnt it possible to write a SQL abstraction layer that provides
> one defined SQL dialect and translates them into the data source's
> SQL ?
>
> How does gnome-db handle query's?
>
> Jens
>
> Why isnt it "Standardized Query Language" ? :-/
>
> _______________________________________________
> gnome-db-list mailing list
> gnome-db-list@gnome.org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-db-list
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]