Re: GPL or LGPL ?

["Sergio A. Kessler" <sak tribctas gba gov ar>]

Rodrigo Moya <rodrigo@linuxave.net> el día Fri, 14 Jul 2000 10:53:03 +0200, 
escribió:

>> >* libgda
>> >* libgda-devel
>> 
>> yup, I saw this on the ml archives...
>> 
>> but, can you put a little more descriptive name ?
>> I'm sure you know very well what GDA means, but other people will
>> have a hard time figuring what the hell is ...  :)
>> (and it will alleviate the namespace pollution, gda can means very
>> differents things)
>> 
>What name? the library is called GNOME Data Access (which could be
>changed to GNU Data Access), and I don't find a better way to call it!!!
>There are some RPMs and debian packages which have names more cryptic
>than that.

yes, sure, there are more cryptic names, but that is not an excuse  :)

>Well, the packages could be called libgnomedataaccess, but isn't it too
>long?

hmmm ...

libgdataaccess  (the only problem is the two 'aa' togheter)
libgdbaccess    (I think this is good)
libgdbc         (ha !)

I mean, db is associated by most users and developers with database ...

sergio