Re: GNU Enterprise

["Peter C. Norton" <spacey lenin nu>]

I like this idea, too.  It would make a form of database access a lot easier
to implement for guile.

-Peter

On Mon, Jul 10, 2000 at 07:10:05AM -0600, Chris Wiegand wrote:
> At 01:34 AM 7/10/00, Rodrigo Moya wrote:
> >what about this, which will not suppose a big change: the basic
> >libraries are called libgda-*, so we could create a set of basic
> >packages called, for example libgda (GDA right now stands for GNOME Data
> >Access, but could be changed to GNU Database Access), which will contain
> >all libraries not being GNOME-dependant. In fact this is one of the
> >things initially made for the debian packages.
> >Then, gnome-db will be the GNOME part using this libgda layer. And then,
> >a KDE-db (or whatever-db) could be coded.
> 
> /me jumps up and down in support of this idea. So, if I understand this 
> correctly, there would be the gda part which would be Gnome independent 
> (aka. the gdaclient, and gda-srv-* folders), then a "gnome-db" area which 
> would be the stuff dependant on Gnome, right? 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> gnome-db-list mailing list
> gnome-db-list@gnome.org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-db-list

-- 
The 5 year plan:
In five years we'll make up another plan.
Or just re-use this one.