Re: GNU Enterprise



Chris Wiegand wrote:
> 
> At 01:34 AM 7/10/00, Rodrigo Moya wrote:
> >what about this, which will not suppose a big change: the basic
> >libraries are called libgda-*, so we could create a set of basic
> >packages called, for example libgda (GDA right now stands for GNOME Data
> >Access, but could be changed to GNU Database Access), which will contain
> >all libraries not being GNOME-dependant. In fact this is one of the
> >things initially made for the debian packages.
> >Then, gnome-db will be the GNOME part using this libgda layer. And then,
> >a KDE-db (or whatever-db) could be coded.
> 
> /me jumps up and down in support of this idea. So, if I understand this
> correctly, there would be the gda part which would be Gnome independent
> (aka. the gdaclient, and gda-srv-* folders), then a "gnome-db" area which
> would be the stuff dependant on Gnome, right?
> 
yes that's it. The GDA part would be libgda-common, libgda-client and
libgda-server, and all the servers of course. These are the base of all
the architecure (the rest is just UI stuff, apart from the bonobo part),
so other toolkits could easily implement something on top of this.






[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]