Re: SCHEMAS and procedures,...

[Rodrigo Moya Piernavieja <rmoya tsai es>]

> >
> > GDA_Connection_FEATURE_OBJECT_ID?
> >
> 
> Ok. Please add it.
> 
> I've modified the postgres provider to have it return good values for
> SCHEMA_PROC_PARAMS.
> 
> Here is the current implementation:
> SCHEMA_PROCS:
> accepts the constraints OBJECT_NAME, OBJECT_SCHEMA, EXTRA_INFO
> returns: (proc name, object id, comments) if no EXTRA_INFO and (proc name,
> object id, owner, comments, number of args, SQL def) if EXTRA_INFO.
> 
> SCHEMA_PROC_PARAMS:
> NEED the constraint OBJECT_NAME with the -->object id<-- (and not the proc
> name, because supports(GDA_Connection_FEATURE_OBJECT_ID) will return TRUE;
> returns: (in/out/inout, type) for all the parameters, in the order in which
> they must be given to the function.
> 
> Do we all agree on this for the next release?
> 
> As for the aggregates, do we agree to use another SCHEMA (like SCHEMA_AGGS)?
> 
Yes for my part!