Re: Antw: New gda-report's DTD
- From: Carlos Perelló Marín <carlos hispalinux es>
- To: Derek Neighbors <d_neighbors llamacom com>
- Cc: Rodrigo Moya <rodrigo linuxave net>,Gerhard Dieringer <DieringG eba-haus de>, gnome-db-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Antw: New gda-report's DTD
- Date: Thu, 03 Aug 2000 16:53:35 +0200
Derek Neighbors escribió:
> > of course! the reports should be dynamic, not as the people in
> > metaphrast do. Although, we could have an option to store the output in
> > a file, so that it can be viewed later. But IMO the data should come
> > from the database on-the-fly.
>
> GNUe is doing something where you have an xml template that holds how you
> want your report to look independent of data, basically what you would see
> in teh designer.
>
> Then it would be ran through an engine to populate it with data. Where it
> would create an xml file with the data and teh formating. We were
> thinking of then running this through a customized Jade. Which gives us
> postscript, pdf, html, rtf out of the box.
>
> > > I don't know if this should be correct. Why you want to save the report
> > > query in a XML file? Why not save it only in RAM ?
>
> I think we planned on saving the formatting on disk, and making saving the
> output optional. So it would be all ram if you wanted, but if it was
> report people wanted over and over without data change you could save for
> archval.
>
> With this architecture we could actual have basis for EDI exports and
> other B2B exchanges if done correctly.
>
> > another option we could have. I think gnome-print generates Postscript,
> > so it should be quite easy to convert to other formats.
> >
>
> Once again a gnome only solution is not very prudent.
>
As I said you before, we are talking about the gnome part of the report
engine, not the library engine. Please take care that is a more uniform way to
present an application to the end user, isn't it?
>
> -derek
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]