Re: Bonobo Unique Application v5
- From: Michael Meeks <michael ximian com>
- To: "Gustavo J. A. M. Carneiro" <gjc inescporto pt>
- Cc: bonobo <gnome-components-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: Bonobo Unique Application v5
- Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2003 15:26:04 +0000
Hi Gustavo,
On Fri, 2003-11-14 at 13:26, Gustavo J. A. M. Carneiro wrote:
> > * the new-instance thing should be a special case separate
> > method on the IDL I think (discuss this one)
> Well, I don't see the point of doing this, other than increased
> robustness, but it's easy to do anyway.
Saves having unobvious built-in 'magic' names :-)
> > If you have a better API for this (doing allocation) please expose it
> > in bonobo-arg.h (I'd like to see the patch for that first). Also, we
>
> Fine, but the new API functions must have different names and old
> functions preserved for backward compatibility, correct?
Yes - that's right; if they are copying variants, I guess adding a
_copy suffix might work ie.
GValue * bonobo_arg_to_gvalue_copy (const CORBA_any *any);
etc.
> > My other concern is that we need to beef up the
> > bonobo-activation-server stuff. I'd quite like you to write a tweaking
> > tool that allows people to list the running servers, and poke at their
> > messages [ if that's feasible ]. I'm particularly interested in the
>
> That would be interesting. Need some time, though. [offtopic: I also
> think it would be nice to improve the bonoboui toolbar customization
> dialog]
Yes that's true - however the libbonoboui stuff in fact needs an almost
complete re-write to use the new Gtk+ XML UI code; and/or we need an
improved / integrated story here.
> > multi-display, multi-lang / that sort of angle on all this. Currently
> > b-a-s is not good at dealing with these sort of uniqueness factors in a
> > sensible way I think.
>
> I don't mind giving a go at this, even within gnome 2.6 time frame,
> but it can be layered on top of the unique application thing, right? In
> that case, I prefer to attack one problem at a time, or I'll get lost.
> :)
Sure; lets get the UniqueApplication stuff in first and then tackle
this; I'm just concerned that we don't forget it - since IMHO this is
prolly the most important outstanding area for improvement.
Regards,
Michael.
--
michael ximian com <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]