Re: (no subject)



Quoting Michael Meeks <michael ximian com>:

> Hi Ariel,
> 
> On Fri, 2003-01-03 at 16:13, Ariel Burbaickij mni fh-giessen de wrote:
> >  The COM book I have talks about client saving
> >  properties of object on its behalf. So as I see
> >  Bonobo is based on the same ideas so I do allow
> >  myself to pose some questions here (not to mention
> >  that I surely prefer free way of development and
> >  ability to look behind the curtain) I rahter
> >  cannot grasp:
> 
> 	Ok - so, there is no free way of development ;-)
> 
> >  1) Why object cannot and should not save its properties itself?
> 
> 	Arguably - it's best for an object to have a PersistStream interface,
> and be able to persist itself to a stream somehow, rather than it being
> done via serializing the PropertyBag.
Can one say that Property Bag is something similar to cookies as used
on the Web ?


Yours sincerely
Ariel Burbaickij



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]