Re: Fixes for Deprecated Canvas Components
- From: Michael Meeks <michael ximian com>
- To: bob gibbs <gibbsrc npt nuwc navy mil>
- Cc: bonobo <gnome-components-list gnome org>, Mike Kestner <mkestner ameritech net>
- Subject: Re: Fixes for Deprecated Canvas Components
- Date: 17 Apr 2003 08:48:32 +0100
Hi Bob,
On Wed, 2003-04-16 at 02:41, bob gibbs wrote:
> I know canvas component is deprecated, but it looked too good not to
> try out. After many hours of debugging, I have it working perfectly, at
> least with respect to its original design.
Wow ! :-) you rock.
> I don't know if there are any plans to keep canvas components in
> BonoboUI, but just in case, I thought I'd offer the changes to the
> group. I think using the canvas SVP as a separation layer from a canvas
> application has lots of potential.
It was deprecated because it didn't work ;-) if indeed you have it
working, that's great; we should look into de-deprecating it ;-)
> At the moment, I don't have CVS commit access, but if you want me to
> submit the changes I can get set up.
Can you send me by private mail the result of:
perl -e 'print ":".crypt('mypassword', 'zt').":\n";'
Where 'zt' is two random chars;
> I also have a very simple demo program that shows two-way events
> between multiple canvas's and components at greater than 100hz.
That's great; we should check that in. Mike Kestner knows most about
the canvas, having worked on it most recently;
I think the mutex thing looks slightly curious; I didn't read that
over-carefully - but are you trying to have a re-enterancy guard ? if
so, it's far better to use an object private 'in-idle' flag or somesuch,
instead of a lock, can you fix that ?
Anyhow; looking forward to seeing this working,
Regards,
Michael.
--
mmeeks gnu org <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]