Re: libbonobo.la ?



Sæll Rodrigo !

I cannot use 0.8.x with my gnome1 distribution at the moment. RH7.2 comes with Gnome 1 and I was hoping to have gnome-db 0.2.96 working for it

As for the flags here is what I get:

/tmp/gnome-db-0.2.96 $  gnome-config --cflags --libs bonobo
-I/usr/include -DNEED_GNOMESUPPORT_H -I/usr/lib/gnome-libs/include -I/usr/include/gtk-1.2 -I/usr/include/glib-1.2 -I/usr/lib/glib/include -I/usr/X11R6/include -I/usr/include/gnome-xml -I/usr/include/freetype2 -rdynamic -L/usr/lib -L/usr/X11R6/lib -lbonobo -lgnomeui -lart_lgpl -lgdk_imlib -lSM -lICE -lgnome -lgnomesupport -lesd -laudiofile -ldb1 -lgdk_pixbuf -lgtk -lgdk -lgmodule -ldl -lXi -lXext -lX11 -loaf
-lORBitCosNaming -lORBit -lIIOP -lORBitutil -lglib -lnsl -lm

What shall I do to avoid the call to the eludign libbonobo.la ?

Thanks

Kveðja


Jean-Baptiste

On Tuesday 06 August 2002 10:23, Rodrigo Moya wrote:
> On Tue, 2002-08-06 at 11:00, Jean-Baptiste Cazier wrote:
> > On Monday 05 August 2002 10:24, you wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2002-08-05 at 09:38, Michael Meeks wrote:
> > > > Hi Jean,
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, 2002-08-02 at 09:57, Jean-Baptiste Cazier wrote:
> > > > > I am trying to compile gnome-db on my RH 7-2 box.
> > > > > Unfortunately I get an error when compiling (see below) because I
> > > > > do not have libbonobo.la it seems that it disappeared from the RPM
> > > > > distibution of bonobo. Could I know why and/or what shall I do to
> > > > > get it and/or get my gnome-db to compile
> > > >
> > > > 	I think you're using an old version of gnome-db, the more recent
> > > > versions have binned bonobo I think.
> > >
> > > no, we've removed bonobo from libgda, gnome-db still uses bonobo. The
> > > problem seems to be, IMO, that he doesn't have the bonobo-devel
> > > package, which is the one that contains that file.
> >
> > Thanks for your suggeestion. But Ia m
> >
> > Well, I am using an "old version" of gnome-db in the sense that I am
> > using the Gnome 1 release because I do not have Gnome2 installed on my
> > machine as yet. But 0.2.96 is supposed to be a stable version of
> > gnome-db.
>
> yes, that should be changed in the web site, since the GNOME 2 version,
> although still in beta stages, is much better and more stable than the
> GNOME 1 version. So, please, use the 0.8.x versions.
>
> > I have try both gnome-db and gnome-db-devel RPM package from RedHat 7-2 :
> > they do not contain the libbonobo.la file and did not allow me to connect
> > to Oracle despite compiling (successfuly) libgda with the oracle flag
>
> you installed gnome-db from sources or from the RPM? if from the RPM, it
> does not contain oracle support. For this, you have to compile libgda
> from sources and pass the --with-oracle option to configure (libgda's
> configure).
>
> > Therefore I tried to compile gnome-db from the tar ball :
> >  gnome-db-0.2.96.tar.gz. . . . . . Mar  2  22:04  996KB
> > Which 'make' crashes with the missing libbonobo.la
> > while I have the 2 bonobo RPM packages installed :
> > bonobo-devel-1.0.7-2
> > bonobo-1.0.7-2
> >
> > So, do you have any other suggestion for what is wrong ?
> > Shall I go back to a VERY old bonobo package (0.13) to get the .la files
> > ?
>
> I'm really confused, since libbonobo.la is not hard-coded anywhere in
> the libgda/gnome-db sources/makefiles. They just use the corresponding
> 'gnome-config --cflags --libs bonobo' to get the compiler and linker
> flags. What 'gnome-config --cflags --libs bonobo' tells you on your
> system?
>
> cheers
> _______________________________________________
> gnome-components-list mailing list
> gnome-components-list gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-components-list



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]