Re: ControlFrame implementation's distinction between in-proc and out-of-proc Controls

[ERDI Gergo <cactus cactus rulez org>]

On 1 Aug 2002, Michael Meeks wrote:

> 	Well; it spews a warning; I think because the lifecycle issues are
> going to be a lot harder. We need a reliable way to determine how to
> deal with the lifecycle of the Control, particularly to handle
> re-parenting. See libbonoboui/doc/control.txt.

I should also note that this is the exact opposite case of the 'in-proc
proxy to out-of-proc control' case as mentioned in the comments in the
code: mine is a false negative (in terms of in-procness), while the latter
one is a false positive.

> 	Apart from lifecycle problems it should work though,

Yes, I told you on #gnome but I forgot to send a follow-up to the mailing
list when I finally got it to work.

-- 
   .--= ULLA! =---------------------.   `We are not here to give users what
   \     http://cactus.rulez.org     \   they want'  -- RMS, at GUADEC 2001
    `---= cactus cactus rulez org =---'
It only takes 20 years for a liberal to become a conservative without changing a single idea.