Re: Patch for bonobo to make it compile in PPC

[Michael Meeks <michael ximian com>]

Havoc,

On 20 Sep 2001, Havoc Pennington wrote:
> Don't worry, I didn't test it either. But a tree that builds is more
> useful than one that doesn't. Granted, a tree that _works_ would be
> even better... but you were not around to sort that out. ;-)

        Breaking all architectures at runtime, simply to build on a
minority architecture, committing an untested and unapproved patch,
without any posting to a mailing list is really not clever at all.

        I don't appreciate "Don't worry, I didn't test it either" -
whatsoever; words fail me for something constructive to say - libbonobo is
not a free for all committing ground; please revert the patch at your
earliest convenience.

	I will fix it correctly shortly, until then a working libbonobo
might be nice. Oh, and please post the revert patch to gcl before
committing.

	Speechlessly,

                Michael.

-- 
 mmeeks gnu org  <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot