Re: GConf vs. bonobo-config
- From: Dietmar Maurer <dietmar ximian com>
- To: veillard redhat com
- Cc: Martin Baulig <martin home-of-linux org>, Glynn Foster <glynn foster sun com>, Ramiro Estrugo <ramiro fateware com>, Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>, gnome-2-0-list gnome org, gconf-list gnome org, gnome-components-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: GConf vs. bonobo-config
- Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2001 16:11:04 +0200
Daniel Veillard wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 16, 2001 at 02:46:56AM +0200, Martin Baulig wrote:
> > With GNOME 2, there are no "non-component based apps", Bonobo is integral part of the
> > platform, so you always have bonobo-config in your app.
>
> Martin, could you tell me then how a non-Gnome program would be able
> to access some of the configuration options ? I have heard in the recent
> past nice things like "we will share user options with KDE or other
> desktops" and it seems things are been planned suddenly which will make
> this pretty hard to do. Configuration is low level, it is owned by
> the user, it should be easily accessible by tools outside of the original
> context. How is this gonna work ?
You only have to link against libbonobo, which is very lightweight. So where is the
problem?
- Dietmar
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]