Re: GConf vs. bonobo-config
- From: Zbigniew Chyla <cyba gnome pl>
- To: Martin Baulig <martin home-of-linux org>
- Cc: Glynn Foster <glynn foster sun com>, Ramiro Estrugo <ramiro fateware com>, Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>, gnome-2-0-list gnome org, gconf-list gnome org, gnome-components-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: GConf vs. bonobo-config
- Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2001 03:24:29 +0200
On Sat, 2001-06-16 at 02:46:56, Martin Baulig wrote:
> > (...)
> > Where do non-component [non-bonobo] based apps fit into this?
> > (...)
>
> I don't see the problem here.
>
> With GNOME 2, there are no "non-component based apps", Bonobo is integral part of the
> platform, so you always have bonobo-config in your app.
Hmm... AFAIR GConf was supposed to be desktop/toolkit/component system/...
independent configuration engine for *NIX systems. It could be used in KDE
and probably in some other projects. *NIX sysadmins always dreamt of such
thing (unified configuration database).
Do you think that KDE and others will use Bonobo in the future?
Zbigniew
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]
