Re: So, what should we do about Persist::getIId?



On Thu, 19 Jul 2001, Michael Meeks wrote:

>         string getString (); 
>   
>         it's not worth delaying indefinately over a name,            

There is no real delay here -- the implementation change is minimal and is
already written by me (as seen in my already-posted patch).
So would you agree with a method named getIId that also includes the
activation scheme i.e. not just MyCorp_Prod_FooComponent but
OAFIID:MyCorp_Prod_FooComponent?
I'm also looking forward for your toughts on doing the use cases you've
outlined on the container side.

-- 
   .--= ULLA! =---------------------.   `We are not here to give users what
   \     http://cactus.rulez.org     \   they want'  -- RMS, at GUADEC 2001
    `---= cactus cactus rulez org =---'
Az én házam az én váram-mondta a király.





[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]