Re: investigation into replacing ref. counts with leases

[Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>]

Darin Adler <darin bentspoon com> writes: 
> I think I have not been clear enough about this aspect of the thing. The interface
> for these leases is newLease, extendLease, and destroyLease. When the last owner
> lets go of an object, it's destroyed immediately as the result of a destroyLease
> that destroys the last lease, whether cross-process or in-process.
> 

Yes, I didn't appreciate that you had this refcount-like aspect to it.

Havoc