Re: Namespacing
- From: Michael Meeks <michael ximian com>
- To: Mike Kestner <mkestner ameritech net>
- Cc: gnome-components-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Namespacing
- Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2001 13:52:10 -0500 (EST)
Hi Mike,
On Sun, 18 Feb 2001, Mike Kestner wrote:
> Are idl files supposed to follow the GNOME_submodule_interface.idl
> pattern? Was that agreed upon?
Yes, certainly, here is the chunk of the FAQ ( just updated ) -
this namespacing is really important, more important than the .oaf /
.oafinfo suffix. We should be using the same namespace for IDL interfaces,
IDL filenames, OAF filenames and (often) OAFIIDs, preferably also for UI
xml files.
@Q: What should I call my oaf / UI / IDL file ?
The name of your oaf file should be based on your portion
of the namespace, eg.
GNOME_Evolution_Calendar.oaf
Com_MyCompany_MyProduct.oaf
This ensures that there will be no conflicts installing
oaf files into a common directory.
HTH,
Michael.
--
mmeeks gnu org <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]