Re: [sigc] Re: [gtkmm] Bringing Bonobo to the masses :)

[Maciej Stachowiak <mjs eazel com>]

Andreas Rottmann <a rottmann gmx at> writes:

> ERDI Gergo <cactus cactus rulez org> writes:
> 
> I see - I better had taken a closer look ;-). Can't we push the gtk+
> people to seperate their sig/slot/object thingy out into a seperate
> library, maybe even into glib? (this could be done keeping both source
> and binary compatibility IMHO)?

That will be done for Gtk+ 2.0
 
> Even if they don't: Whoever is making that decision: I beg: no mor
> GUI/X deps than _absolutly_ necessary.
> 

Bonobo has already been split into x and non-x dependent libs
(although both still depend on Gtk+ for now).

 - Maciej