Re: Continuing discussion of oaf ...



Hi Martin,

On 27 Nov 2000, Martin Baulig wrote:
> Miguel de Icaza <miguel helixcode com> writes:
> > > If you get a clash on the IDL name, this doesn't really make your package
> > > non-functional - for instance, it won't affect binary packages at all as 
> > > long as you only use one of them in all applications.
> > 
> > If the IDL names clash, but the method names do not match, you are in
> > deep trouble.  What makes you think you are not?
> 
> No, you are not necessarily in deep trouble:
  
        Of course, you are right, some compiled mappings will be
fine; however other langauage bindings will be badly screwed. You are in  
deep trouble.
  
        Regards,
  
                Michael.

-- 
 mmeeks gnu org  <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot





[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]