Re: Continuing discussion of oaf ...
- From: Michael Meeks <michael helixcode com>
- To: Martin Baulig <martin home-of-linux org>
- Cc: Miguel de Icaza <miguel helixcode com>, gnome-components-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Continuing discussion of oaf ...
- Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2000 06:31:23 -0500 (EST)
Hi Martin,
On 27 Nov 2000, Martin Baulig wrote:
> Miguel de Icaza <miguel helixcode com> writes:
> > > If you get a clash on the IDL name, this doesn't really make your package
> > > non-functional - for instance, it won't affect binary packages at all as
> > > long as you only use one of them in all applications.
> >
> > If the IDL names clash, but the method names do not match, you are in
> > deep trouble. What makes you think you are not?
>
> No, you are not necessarily in deep trouble:
Of course, you are right, some compiled mappings will be
fine; however other langauage bindings will be badly screwed. You are in
deep trouble.
Regards,
Michael.
--
mmeeks gnu org <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]