Re: Continuing discussion of oaf ...



> >From what I heard about DCOP, it talks to already-running components, such
> a running KWrite etc., but is does not activate an object. Talking to a an
> already running component has nothing at all to do with a naming scheme -
> it's just a matter of identifying that component (by its IOR, PID, whatever).

IOR is just not useful.  PID is a joke.

Miguel.




[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]