Re: Patch for review.
- From: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs eazel com>
- To: Nat Friedman <nat helixcode com>
- Cc: gnome-components-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Patch for review.
- Date: 10 Feb 2000 16:20:20 -0800
I have two comments.
Nat Friedman <nat@helixcode.com> writes:
> Hi guys,
>
> The attached patch does three things:
>
> a. There was a problem with controls not being reparented
> properly. Basically if you reparent a GtkWidget which has
> as an ancestor a BonoboControl, the control would crash.
> The reason for this was that reparenting causes the
> GtkSocket on the container side to get re-realized, and a
> new XID therefore gets passed to the control, which doesn't
> know how to deal with it and chokes. The patch basically
> creates a GtkPlug using the new XID, reparents the
> control's top-level widget, and destroys the old plug.
> Easy as pie.
In the local bypass case, it would be good to just avoid doing
anything if we're getting a second X11 ID which is also local. In
fact, I'm not sure the patch is correct right now because it would try
to add the control a second time to the parent of the socket, and I
don't even know what it does to try to pack something a second time
into the same box. I'd test this patch, but since it also breaks the
API, it would be a pain to try it on Nautilus, my usual test case for
the local socket bypass hack.
> c. Adds an "autoactivate" facility to controls which allows
> them to automatically be activated when they get focus.
> This way, when you click on a control, it knows to merge
> it's menus/toolbars. This feature is off by default (so
> that Views get the right behavior, basically), but
> BonoboWidget turns it on.
Pardon if this is an obvious question, but why would auto-activation
by default be bad for Views?
- Maciej
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]