Re: oaf gnome-factory problems
- From: Diego Sevilla Ruiz <dsevilla ditec um es>
- To: Mathieu Lacage <mathieu eazel com>
- Cc: Rodrigo Moya <rodrigo linuxave net>,gnome-components-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: oaf gnome-factory problems
- Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2000 19:25:21 +0200 (CEST)
Hi Rodrigo and Mathieu:
On 11 Aug 2000, Mathieu Lacage wrote:
> Rodrigo Moya <rodrigo@linuxave.net> writes:
>
> > Hi all!
> >
> > I am trying to compile a program which makes use of GnomeFactory, and
> > which compiled and run successfully with gnorba, but now with OAF I get
> > these errors:
> >
> > ../../lib/gda-server/.libs/libgda-server.so: undefined reference to
> > `POA_GNOME_GenericFactory__fini'
> > ../../lib/gda-server/.libs/libgda-server.so: undefined reference to
> > `_ORBIT_skel_GNOME_GenericFactory_create_object'
> > ../../lib/gda-server/.libs/libgda-server.so: undefined reference to
> > `POA_GNOME_GenericFactory__init'
> > ../../lib/gda-server/.libs/libgda-server.so: undefined reference to
> > `_ORBIT_GNOME_GenericFactory_CannotActivate_marshal'
> > ../../lib/gda-server/.libs/libgda-server.so: undefined reference to
> > `_ORBIT_skel_GNOME_GenericFactory_supports'
> >
> > as I was told by Michael, this is very strange, but, if I run:
> >
> > [rodrigo@txalaparta] nm /usr/lib/liboaf.so.0.0.0 | grep GenericFactory
> > 0000b7e0 T GNOME_GenericFactory_CannotActivate__free
> > 00010560 D GNOME_GenericFactory__classid
> > 0000b3c0 T GNOME_GenericFactory_create_object
> > 0000b1d0 T GNOME_GenericFactory_supports
> > 00010520 D TC_GNOME_GenericFactory_CannotActivate_struct
> > 000104e0 D TC_GNOME_GenericFactory_struct
> > 0000b1a0 T _ORBIT_GNOME_GenericFactory_CannotActivate_demarshal
> >
> > so those functions are not in liboaf nor in the files generated by
> > orbit-idl. where are they?
>
> I think they are in the skeletons of the factory.
>
no doubt ;-)
> liboaf does not link against the skeletons of the factory because it does
> not use them. I guess you are trying to implement a factory yourself, no ?
>
> If so, we can fix this in the upcomming release by making liboaf link
> against oaf-factory-skels.c (add it in liboaf/Makefile.am -> source section)
>
I'm sorry if I am writting garbage, but, shouldn't it be
gnome-factory-skels.c? In fact, correct my if I am wrong, but liboaf
should not include it if it does not use it. The programmer of a new
factory should include it, as happens with any implementation of a CORBA
server that a programmer wants to write based in the skeletons, of course.
> If this fixes your problem, I think maciej will be happy to make it work
> for you, (we already discussed this sooner and he agreed with me: we can do
> it :)
>
> Mathieu
>
> >
> > What am I doing wrong?
> >
> > cheers
> >
Regards.
diego.
--
Diego Sevilla Ruiz - http://ditec.um.es/~dsevilla/ - dsevilla@um.es
Departamento de Ingeniería y Tecnología de Computadores
Facultad de Informática. Universidad de Murcia
Campus de Espinardo - 30080 Murcia (SPAIN). Tel. +34-968-367570
\huge d\em\kern-.36em\lower-.2ex\hbox{\small sevilla}\kern-.1em@um.es
$_="\\l/) (>". "_'\n<";@@= /.|\n/g;$_=
"\@". "\007f". "DDq". "DD5". "\204".
"\@". "DT4CE". "D54E". "DD". "\244".
"\021". "dBDTC". "\010DD". "\200\$FD\024".
"GDAG". "DAGDT". "CqI";$c =0;$p =5;for$q
(/./g) {$q= ord$q; for(a, b){$z[$c]
=$@[$p+=($q&15) -4];$q>>=4;$c+=33 ;$c>98 &&($c-=98);}};print@z;
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]