Re: Bonobo 0.1 release plans.

[Dick Porter <dick acm org>]

On Wed, Jun 23, 1999 at 10:51:09AM -0400, Elliot Lee wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Jun 1999, David Orme wrote:
> 
> > Bit 2: My personal preference is either GNOME::Obj or GNOME::Object.
> 
> The whole reason for this discussion is because 'Object' is a reserved
> word in CORBA, so we had to switch away from GNOME::Object :)

You could treat OMG namespace pollution the same way as C++ namespace pollution
and call it GNOME::Objekt

OK, maybe not :-)

> 
> -- Elliot

- Dick