RE: Bonobo 0.1 release plans.
- From: "Matthew Loper" <matthew loper org>
- To: <gnome-components-list gnome org>
- Cc: "Elliot Lee" <sopwith redhat com>
- Subject: RE: Bonobo 0.1 release plans.
- Date: Tue, 22 Jun 1999 12:38:35 -0400
> Why do we have to rename this at all?
>
> "component" is definitely a misnomer for an interface with those
> particular three methods.
In COM, every object exposes those three methods with `IUnknown'; ie,
_every_ COM component has those three methods. If all COMponents have those
three methods, why not just make those three methods part and parcel of a
`component' interface? Remember that bonobo, and the
ref/unref/query_interface combo, are being derived from OLE.
> It'd be nice to use "object", but "obj" works.
Have you tried explaining `obj's to a layman? Miguel just gave a talk in
Paris, where (onstage) he faced the annoying task of explaining what an
`obj' is, and how that might differ from a CORBA object.
Language is half the battle in programming, and we have to get it right.
Matthew@loper.org
http://loper.org/~mmlop
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]