Re: Reuse of Bonoboo IDLs
- From: Nat Friedman <nat helixcode com>
- To: djcb dds nl
- Cc: gnome-components-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Reuse of Bonoboo IDLs
- Date: Sun, 12 Dec 1999 19:13:27 -0500 (EST)
bulkmail@dds.nl writes:
> I'd consider the Unknown interface a abstract base class
Except it's not abstract in Bonobo.
> -- apart from ref
> counting there's not so much interesting you can do with it.
Query_interface is a pretty big deal.
> So I'd say you
> define you interface, and have it derive from Unknown.
Yep, that's what we do all over Bonobo.
> Note that Bonobo also offers default implementations of these interfaces.
> While it's trivial to re-implement Unknown, the Persistance stuff will be a
> bit harder (take a look at the libefs dir in the Bonobo distribution).
Yeah, you can reimplement them. Of course, the reason we
implemented them was so that you wouldn't have to.
Nat
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]