Bonobo is Screwed
- From: Nat Friedman <nat nat org>
- To: Elliot Lee <sopwith redhat com>
- Cc: gnome-components-list gnome org
- Subject: Bonobo is Screwed
- Date: Wed, 8 Dec 1999 22:33:56 -0500 (EST)
Elliot Lee writes:
> OK, not quite.
>
> But basically, all the objects are using that broken new()/construct()
> stuff, and the construct stuff is not even going to be usable to the C++
> bindings (which are the only things that use it) because actual
> functionality is being put in the new() methods and because the
> construct() arguments don't match the new() arguments.
>
> I started hacking it to use the gtk argument system, but I really don't
> want to do the whole thing.
Why does this matter exactly? The _new() calls _construct() in
each of the objects, and exports _construct() to the world, as it is
useful for subclassing.
The C++ bindings can just call _new() themselves.
Nat
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]